THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU Vs RAJ MOSAIC TILE WORKS
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - appellants is a works contractor who had undertaken the working of laying and polishing of ...
CESTAT disallows ‘capital goods’ / ‘inputs’ credit to telecom operators on shared towers / pre-fabricated buildings, i.e. ‘passive telecom infrastructure’ for rendering “telecommunication services”; Applies Bombay HC ratio in Bharti Airtel, observes, “….judicial discipline demands that ratio of jurisdictional High Court is to be followed by this Bench.”; Distinguishes ratio laid down in Sai Samhita Storage Ltd, SG Navratna and GTL Infrastructure Ltd on facts; Observes that in those cases, nature of output service required existence of infrastructure in place, whereas in instant case, towers / pre-fabricated buildings predominantly created & used for rendering own telecom / cellular services; Rejects assessees’ contentions that - (i) towers and shelters can be dismantled and shifted to other place, hence are movable and liable to excise duty, and (ii) credit cannot be denied even if immovable property comes into existence since it is used for providing taxable services; However, restricts demand to normal period of limitation and sets aside penalties absent tax evasion intention and since issue of interpretative nature : Mumbai CESTAT
We are Ahmedabad based professional consulting firm. We are providing various services to Construction, Real Estate and Project Companies in various areas like Indirect Taxation – Service Tax & Multi state VAT consultancy, ERP implementation, Site & Management audit, Designing Tender & other related contractual documents etc.