Log in Register

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *
View more blog entries

Consult Construction

Consult Us For Construction

Service Tax Case Law - Refund on erroneous payment of service tax under RCM.

Posted by on in Service Tax
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 659
  • 0 Comments
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print
  • Report this post

M/s GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF CGST, NAVI MUMBAI

Service Tax – erroneous payment of service tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism - Rejection of refund claim made by the appellant on the ground that it failed to qualify the test of unjust enrichment - jurisdiction of the Tribunal to entertain the appeal. 

HELD - rejection of refund is solely confined to the dispute concerning applicability of doctrine of unjust enrichment to the appellant since the claim of refund was allowed in the first round of litigation and the same attained finality being unchallenged by the department. Therefore, the determination of such an issue is well within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal 

The appellant’s claim that it had paid the Service Tax under the erroneous belief that as per RCM, it is liable to pay the same but subsequently Board Circular had clarified the same to be non-taxable. Therefore, the service tax is supposed to be treated as a deposit as there is no sanctioned behind it by the legislature in conformity to Section 265 of the constitution of India - Commissioner (Appeals) had drawn a presumption that incidence of duty had passed on knowing, fully well that presumption.

However strong, cannot take the place of proof - Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Authority had drawn adverse inference to the bonafideness of the appellant who consider it their burdened duty to pay Service Tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism which was infect not payable as per clarifictory circular issue by the Board. Therefore, the appellant has passed the test of unjust enrichment and it is entitled to the refund claimed by it for non-leviable Service Tax 

The appellant is entitled to refund claim with applicable interest - The appeal is allowed.

Rate this blog entry:
0
Trackback URL for this blog entry.

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest
Guest Saturday, 20 July 2019

Like us on facebook

Twitter Feed

ConsultC Please find the latest presentation given to select gathering of real estate developers at Kolkata on West Bengal H… https://t.co/Uizrcczy13
ConsultC Apart from the intricacies of the Forms and constant regulatory changes, GST has a lot of other aspects. We had an… https://t.co/YB1asAgU2s
ConsultC Second Edition of our book released with latest amendments upto September, 2018 https://t.co/eOwUcNZife

Address

Address:
304, Super Plaza, Sandesh Press Road, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad
Gujarat-380054
Tel:
+91 - 079 - 40032950
E-Mail:
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Website:
www.consultconstruction.com

markerFind on Google Maps

Who we are

We are Ahmedabad based professional consulting firm. We are providing various services to Construction, Real Estate and Project Companies in various areas like Indirect Taxation – Service Tax & Multi state VAT consultancy, ERP implementation, Site & Management audit, Designing Tender & other related contractual documents etc.